Johnson & Johnson is facing a lawsuit in the UK over claims that their talcum powder contains asbestos, which allegedly causes cancer in women.

This is not a new legal issue for the company, as they have been involved in similar lawsuits in North America for several years.

While Johnson & Johnson has settled a number of these cases, they have denied any wrongdoing and maintain that their products are safe.

Erik Haas, Johnson & Johnson's vice president of litigation, has stated that their analyses, backed by independent science, show no asbestos contamination.

However, the World Health Organization has categorized talc as 'probably carcinogenic,' fueling the ongoing debate.

To address potential liabilities, Johnson & Johnson has transferred these to Kenvue, its former division, implying that Kenvue is responsible outside North America.

This legal strategy raises questions about corporate responsibility and ethical accountability.

Lawyers have claimed that the company knew about potential risks as far back as the 1970s.

This situation poses a challenge for Johnson & Johnson's public image and consumer trust as they continue to tackle these serious allegations.